<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reflections on Aurora</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thecurvature.com/2007/10/02/reflections-on-aurora/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thecurvature.com/2007/10/02/reflections-on-aurora/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2012 20:40:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kali</title>
		<link>http://thecurvature.com/2007/10/02/reflections-on-aurora/#comment-1606</link>
		<dc:creator>Kali</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2007 07:26:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecurvature.com/2007/10/02/reflections-on-aurora/#comment-1606</guid>
		<description>You are completely right, it is NOT over.  The anti-choice crowd is still strong here.  Harassing women and taking down plates and pictures of those who enter the Aurora clinic from a privately owned grocery store Dominick&#039;s (owned by safeway) please visit the http://ppaurora.blogspot.com/ website to find out how a phone call or two to the Safeway reps will hopefully stop the harassment and help women in my area NoT fear getting the health care they need.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are completely right, it is NOT over.  The anti-choice crowd is still strong here.  Harassing women and taking down plates and pictures of those who enter the Aurora clinic from a privately owned grocery store Dominick&#8217;s (owned by safeway) please visit the <a href="http://ppaurora.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://ppaurora.blogspot.com/</a> website to find out how a phone call or two to the Safeway reps will hopefully stop the harassment and help women in my area NoT fear getting the health care they need.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cara</title>
		<link>http://thecurvature.com/2007/10/02/reflections-on-aurora/#comment-1575</link>
		<dc:creator>Cara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 22:46:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecurvature.com/2007/10/02/reflections-on-aurora/#comment-1575</guid>
		<description>Okay.  You&#039;re entitled to your opinion.

I would just like to say a couple of things, though:

1. I was referring to anti-choice &lt;i&gt;leaders&lt;/i&gt;.  Not all anti-choice people.  As an example it&#039;s the same as saying &quot;Republican Senators sure aren&#039;t smart.&quot;  Well, you can disagree with my assertion that they aren&#039;t intelligent, or just think that it is in bad taste for me to point out their lack of intelligence.  But I in no way said that all Republican-affiliated voters are stupid.

2. I did not say that they were idiots, or stupid, etc.  I said that I don&#039;t give them points for intelligence.  That means that I don&#039;t perceive intelligence to be their strongest trait, not that I think they&#039;re stupid as shit.  I wish that they were; we would have gotten rid of them a long time ago.

3. Though I did not, in this particular post, generalize about anti-choice individuals, I have to say that I don&#039;t have a huge problem in doing so.  I define anti-choice as those individuals who actively work to take a woman&#039;s right to choose away from her, not those who in the privacy of their own home think that abortion is bad.  But I absolutely do not have a problem with stereotyping the kind of people who stand outside of clinics and harass women as they go to seek medical care.  In fact, I&#039;m not really sure that &quot;stereotype&quot; is the right word.  I&#039;d say that it is more of a judgment based on their actions and the people whom they choose to associate with.

If you&#039;d like to discuss it further, that&#039;s fine.  If not, we can agree to disagree.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay.  You&#8217;re entitled to your opinion.</p>
<p>I would just like to say a couple of things, though:</p>
<p>1. I was referring to anti-choice <i>leaders</i>.  Not all anti-choice people.  As an example it&#8217;s the same as saying &#8220;Republican Senators sure aren&#8217;t smart.&#8221;  Well, you can disagree with my assertion that they aren&#8217;t intelligent, or just think that it is in bad taste for me to point out their lack of intelligence.  But I in no way said that all Republican-affiliated voters are stupid.</p>
<p>2. I did not say that they were idiots, or stupid, etc.  I said that I don&#8217;t give them points for intelligence.  That means that I don&#8217;t perceive intelligence to be their strongest trait, not that I think they&#8217;re stupid as shit.  I wish that they were; we would have gotten rid of them a long time ago.</p>
<p>3. Though I did not, in this particular post, generalize about anti-choice individuals, I have to say that I don&#8217;t have a huge problem in doing so.  I define anti-choice as those individuals who actively work to take a woman&#8217;s right to choose away from her, not those who in the privacy of their own home think that abortion is bad.  But I absolutely do not have a problem with stereotyping the kind of people who stand outside of clinics and harass women as they go to seek medical care.  In fact, I&#8217;m not really sure that &#8220;stereotype&#8221; is the right word.  I&#8217;d say that it is more of a judgment based on their actions and the people whom they choose to associate with.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;d like to discuss it further, that&#8217;s fine.  If not, we can agree to disagree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rebecca</title>
		<link>http://thecurvature.com/2007/10/02/reflections-on-aurora/#comment-1574</link>
		<dc:creator>Rebecca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 22:20:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecurvature.com/2007/10/02/reflections-on-aurora/#comment-1574</guid>
		<description>While I agree with the majority of your article, I take issue with your characterization of anti-choice activists as unintelligent. I am strongly pro-choice, but I believe that making a generalization about people who don&#039;t agree with me is not only rude, it&#039;s also a way of dehumanizing the opposition, and I certainly don&#039;t support that. While some pro-lifers are certainly idiots blindly following their religious leaders, many of them are people who just genuinely believe that life is sacred, and have good reasons for thinking so. I don&#039;t think that disagreeing with someone is a reason to call them an idiot. Stereotyping a group is wrong, even if it&#039;s a group that makes your blood boil.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I agree with the majority of your article, I take issue with your characterization of anti-choice activists as unintelligent. I am strongly pro-choice, but I believe that making a generalization about people who don&#8217;t agree with me is not only rude, it&#8217;s also a way of dehumanizing the opposition, and I certainly don&#8217;t support that. While some pro-lifers are certainly idiots blindly following their religious leaders, many of them are people who just genuinely believe that life is sacred, and have good reasons for thinking so. I don&#8217;t think that disagreeing with someone is a reason to call them an idiot. Stereotyping a group is wrong, even if it&#8217;s a group that makes your blood boil.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brandann</title>
		<link>http://thecurvature.com/2007/10/02/reflections-on-aurora/#comment-1573</link>
		<dc:creator>brandann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 20:12:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecurvature.com/2007/10/02/reflections-on-aurora/#comment-1573</guid>
		<description>ugh...you are so right!  while we are being happy about this, we are missing the point completely.

and the crazies aren&#039;t done...if you scan the anti-choice blogs, you can see that they are just waiting for the doors to open to launch their next bullshit plan...this time claiming that PP is just a &quot;tennant&quot; and subject to special permits...i say again that perhaps i read too much...sounds like another goose chase to me...

for all the women who just want good health care, i certainly hope that these seemingly selfish people can find it in their self-described good hearts to back off, and let women (and men, b/c if i am not mistaken there is some men&#039;s care offered at PPs as well) get the care they deserve...affordably and w/o fear!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ugh&#8230;you are so right!  while we are being happy about this, we are missing the point completely.</p>
<p>and the crazies aren&#8217;t done&#8230;if you scan the anti-choice blogs, you can see that they are just waiting for the doors to open to launch their next bullshit plan&#8230;this time claiming that PP is just a &#8220;tennant&#8221; and subject to special permits&#8230;i say again that perhaps i read too much&#8230;sounds like another goose chase to me&#8230;</p>
<p>for all the women who just want good health care, i certainly hope that these seemingly selfish people can find it in their self-described good hearts to back off, and let women (and men, b/c if i am not mistaken there is some men&#8217;s care offered at PPs as well) get the care they deserve&#8230;affordably and w/o fear!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bonnie</title>
		<link>http://thecurvature.com/2007/10/02/reflections-on-aurora/#comment-1572</link>
		<dc:creator>bonnie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 17:07:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecurvature.com/2007/10/02/reflections-on-aurora/#comment-1572</guid>
		<description>I am glad you posted this.  I have incredibly mixed feelings, and like yours, mine are stemming from the fact that this shouldn&#039;t be happening.

I logged on to the NY Times and read an AP headline that said &quot;Abortion Clinic Allowed to Open in Illinois&quot;.  And my very first reaction was that I should be relieved or pleased or something.  Instead I&#039;m indignant.

ALLOWED????? Opening a health center is completely 100% legal.  They were not ALLOWED to open, they were not permitted to, they were always in the right. 

The article gets worse as it begins:
&quot;A suburban Planned Parenthood clinic prohibited from opening after anti-abortion activists raised questions about how it received its building permits will be allowed to open, city officials said Monday.&quot;

Raised questions? Hell no. Let&#039;s try &quot;...when anti-choice activists unfairly accused&quot; or &quot;attacked&quot; or &quot;provoked an unfounded investigation&quot; or &quot;when city officials bowed to the pressure of insane protesters and wasted taxpayer money to hire excessive legal aide to investigate completely unfounded permit issues&quot;

grrrrrrrr.  

I am relieved its open.  But this shouldn&#039;t be the cost and I can only see it going further and further down this road in the future for Planned Parenthood and other pro-choice orgs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am glad you posted this.  I have incredibly mixed feelings, and like yours, mine are stemming from the fact that this shouldn&#8217;t be happening.</p>
<p>I logged on to the NY Times and read an AP headline that said &#8220;Abortion Clinic Allowed to Open in Illinois&#8221;.  And my very first reaction was that I should be relieved or pleased or something.  Instead I&#8217;m indignant.</p>
<p>ALLOWED????? Opening a health center is completely 100% legal.  They were not ALLOWED to open, they were not permitted to, they were always in the right. </p>
<p>The article gets worse as it begins:<br />
&#8220;A suburban Planned Parenthood clinic prohibited from opening after anti-abortion activists raised questions about how it received its building permits will be allowed to open, city officials said Monday.&#8221;</p>
<p>Raised questions? Hell no. Let&#8217;s try &#8220;&#8230;when anti-choice activists unfairly accused&#8221; or &#8220;attacked&#8221; or &#8220;provoked an unfounded investigation&#8221; or &#8220;when city officials bowed to the pressure of insane protesters and wasted taxpayer money to hire excessive legal aide to investigate completely unfounded permit issues&#8221;</p>
<p>grrrrrrrr.  </p>
<p>I am relieved its open.  But this shouldn&#8217;t be the cost and I can only see it going further and further down this road in the future for Planned Parenthood and other pro-choice orgs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

