<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rape Article Offensive-Off</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thecurvature.com/2007/10/09/rape-article-offensive-off/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thecurvature.com/2007/10/09/rape-article-offensive-off/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 14:45:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: J</title>
		<link>http://thecurvature.com/2007/10/09/rape-article-offensive-off/#comment-8641</link>
		<dc:creator>J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 08:04:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecurvature.com/2007/10/09/rape-article-offensive-off/#comment-8641</guid>
		<description>Again with the phoney and completely fabricated &quot;statistics&quot;...women in the U.S. are significantly more likely to be raped by someone they know in their own home. Period. In fact, two-thirds of all rape victims here are raped by people they know.

The myth of the scary monster of a stranger in a dark alley panting while he waits for a scantily clad lone woman to walk by needs to die, the sooner the better.

Why doesn&#039;t the government, or journalists, if they *really* want to &quot;help women lower their risk of being raped&quot; pay for Public Service Announcements that inform women that they are far more likely to be raped by a friend or family member while stone cold sober than they are to be raped after a night out sloppy drunk? 

Maybe they should advise against women even knowing any men, since knowing men seems to be, statistically, the most significant factor in a woman&#039;s rape risk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Again with the phoney and completely fabricated &#8220;statistics&#8221;&#8230;women in the U.S. are significantly more likely to be raped by someone they know in their own home. Period. In fact, two-thirds of all rape victims here are raped by people they know.</p>
<p>The myth of the scary monster of a stranger in a dark alley panting while he waits for a scantily clad lone woman to walk by needs to die, the sooner the better.</p>
<p>Why doesn&#8217;t the government, or journalists, if they *really* want to &#8220;help women lower their risk of being raped&#8221; pay for Public Service Announcements that inform women that they are far more likely to be raped by a friend or family member while stone cold sober than they are to be raped after a night out sloppy drunk? </p>
<p>Maybe they should advise against women even knowing any men, since knowing men seems to be, statistically, the most significant factor in a woman&#8217;s rape risk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SunlessNick</title>
		<link>http://thecurvature.com/2007/10/09/rape-article-offensive-off/#comment-8640</link>
		<dc:creator>SunlessNick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 05:59:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecurvature.com/2007/10/09/rape-article-offensive-off/#comment-8640</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Okay, the assumption here is that somehow this article is &lt;em&gt;informing&lt;/em&gt; women. What, exactly, is it informing them of? Women don’t know about rape? They haven’t heard about it incessantly from their mothers, fathers, teachers, friends and television from the moment they started growing breasts?  &lt;strong-  Cara&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;I&#039;m late too, but this is what jumped out at me.  Articles like the BBC one - and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-1045954/PETER-HITCHENS-How-Left-censored-blindingly-obvious-truth-rape.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;any&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2007/sep/26/feminismsrapefallacy&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;number&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.10news.com/news/17024176/detail.html?rss=sand&amp;psp=news&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;of&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://emqtv.com/blog/uncommonsense/2008/10/25/advice-4-women-how-to-not-get-a-deserved-raping/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;others&lt;/a&gt; (trigger warnings all, especially the last, whose fucking &lt;em&gt;URL&lt;/em&gt; needs one) - purport to teach women about a subject in which they are &lt;em&gt;guaranteed&lt;/em&gt; to be way ahead of the men writing the articles.  Plus, the men who write such articles invariably seem to think that it&#039;s some Great New Insight on their part.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Okay, the assumption here is that somehow this article is <em>informing</em> women. What, exactly, is it informing them of? Women don’t know about rape? They haven’t heard about it incessantly from their mothers, fathers, teachers, friends and television from the moment they started growing breasts?  &lt;strong-  Cara</p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;m late too, but this is what jumped out at me.  Articles like the BBC one &#8211; and <a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-1045954/PETER-HITCHENS-How-Left-censored-blindingly-obvious-truth-rape.html" rel="nofollow">any</a> <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2007/sep/26/feminismsrapefallacy" rel="nofollow">number</a> <a href="http://www.10news.com/news/17024176/detail.html?rss=sand&amp;psp=news" rel="nofollow">of</a> <a href="http://emqtv.com/blog/uncommonsense/2008/10/25/advice-4-women-how-to-not-get-a-deserved-raping/" rel="nofollow">others</a> (trigger warnings all, especially the last, whose fucking <em>URL</em> needs one) &#8211; purport to teach women about a subject in which they are <em>guaranteed</em> to be way ahead of the men writing the articles.  Plus, the men who write such articles invariably seem to think that it&#8217;s some Great New Insight on their part.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jennifer Kesler</title>
		<link>http://thecurvature.com/2007/10/09/rape-article-offensive-off/#comment-8635</link>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Kesler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 19:53:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecurvature.com/2007/10/09/rape-article-offensive-off/#comment-8635</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m late to the party here, and most everything has been said, but this bit from the article also bugged me: &quot;rape or serious sexual assault.&quot;

What distinction does the editor think we&#039;re making? My guess is they think rape only means forced coitus. Are we ever going to get past that thinking?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m late to the party here, and most everything has been said, but this bit from the article also bugged me: &#8220;rape or serious sexual assault.&#8221;</p>
<p>What distinction does the editor think we&#8217;re making? My guess is they think rape only means forced coitus. Are we ever going to get past that thinking?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kiki</title>
		<link>http://thecurvature.com/2007/10/09/rape-article-offensive-off/#comment-7234</link>
		<dc:creator>Kiki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 02:41:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecurvature.com/2007/10/09/rape-article-offensive-off/#comment-7234</guid>
		<description>&quot;it is absolutely true. a woman should be able to drink as much a she wants without fear of someone raping and/or taking advantage of her, but in the real world, this is not the case. i should be able to walk down the ghetto in an armani suit waving $100 bills around without fear of getting mugged, but reality says it’s a bad idea.&quot;


Wow, most rape analogies never fail to disgust me. How the hell does someone equate walking around waving $100 bills in a bad neighborhood to being raped while you just so happen to be under the influence of alcohol? Oh yeah, my bad, because when you are drunk you are waving your slut flag around saying &quot;rape me!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;it is absolutely true. a woman should be able to drink as much a she wants without fear of someone raping and/or taking advantage of her, but in the real world, this is not the case. i should be able to walk down the ghetto in an armani suit waving $100 bills around without fear of getting mugged, but reality says it’s a bad idea.&#8221;</p>
<p>Wow, most rape analogies never fail to disgust me. How the hell does someone equate walking around waving $100 bills in a bad neighborhood to being raped while you just so happen to be under the influence of alcohol? Oh yeah, my bad, because when you are drunk you are waving your slut flag around saying &#8220;rape me!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#8220;Causing Sexual Contact&#8221;? : The Curvature</title>
		<link>http://thecurvature.com/2007/10/09/rape-article-offensive-off/#comment-6532</link>
		<dc:creator>&#8220;Causing Sexual Contact&#8221;? : The Curvature</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 00:21:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecurvature.com/2007/10/09/rape-article-offensive-off/#comment-6532</guid>
		<description>[...] have on numerous occasions, the most recent being during the Day of Blogs, railed against the use of language other than &#8220;rape&#8221; to describe rape. This includes everything from [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] have on numerous occasions, the most recent being during the Day of Blogs, railed against the use of language other than &#8220;rape&#8221; to describe rape. This includes everything from [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://thecurvature.com/2007/10/09/rape-article-offensive-off/#comment-2053</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 22:50:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecurvature.com/2007/10/09/rape-article-offensive-off/#comment-2053</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Unless people have those cameras in their homes, you would never know…&lt;/i&gt;

Very true. 

Hugh, you can&#039;t afford to be this naive - as statistics show, bars and back-alleys don&#039;t have much to do with rape. 12% of women experiencing sexual violence from an intimate partner - that works out to being over 245,000 Australian women sexually assaulted by the person closest to her. That&#039;s not going to happen in an alley or anywhere near a CCTV camera.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Unless people have those cameras in their homes, you would never know…</i></p>
<p>Very true. </p>
<p>Hugh, you can&#8217;t afford to be this naive &#8211; as statistics show, bars and back-alleys don&#8217;t have much to do with rape. 12% of women experiencing sexual violence from an intimate partner &#8211; that works out to being over 245,000 Australian women sexually assaulted by the person closest to her. That&#8217;s not going to happen in an alley or anywhere near a CCTV camera.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jenee</title>
		<link>http://thecurvature.com/2007/10/09/rape-article-offensive-off/#comment-2052</link>
		<dc:creator>Jenee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 22:37:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecurvature.com/2007/10/09/rape-article-offensive-off/#comment-2052</guid>
		<description>Unless people have those cameras in their homes, you would never know...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unless people have those cameras in their homes, you would never know&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://thecurvature.com/2007/10/09/rape-article-offensive-off/#comment-2051</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 22:30:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecurvature.com/2007/10/09/rape-article-offensive-off/#comment-2051</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;OMG IT’S GODWIN’S LAW!!!&lt;/i&gt;

ohhh snap. Hugh just got served.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>OMG IT’S GODWIN’S LAW!!!</i></p>
<p>ohhh snap. Hugh just got served.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cara</title>
		<link>http://thecurvature.com/2007/10/09/rape-article-offensive-off/#comment-2049</link>
		<dc:creator>Cara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 22:24:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecurvature.com/2007/10/09/rape-article-offensive-off/#comment-2049</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin&#039;s_law&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;OMG IT&#039;S GODWIN&#039;S LAW!!!&lt;/a&gt;

Who would have thunk?  

Could someone please explain to me how looking at this comment: &lt;i&gt;I do by the way accept that we live in a rape apologist culture now that I’ve seen and as soon as you accept that I’m not part of it I’m off to different forums to spread the word and help our cause&lt;/i&gt; and inferring that Hugh wants my approval is somehow flattering myself?  I thought that it was &lt;i&gt;reading&lt;/i&gt;.

Seriously, dude, you&#039;re fucked in the head.  If you keep commenting, yes, I will ban you, because there&#039;s a difference between argument and vomiting all over someone&#039;s blog.  But you&#039;re clearly an idiot and an insincere one at that.  You just went from &quot;oh, but I&#039;m just trying to learn, I&#039;m such a Nice Guy(tm)&quot; to head spinning around in circles in 60 seconds flat.  It&#039;s impressive, but nothing to be proud of.

Why on earth, by the way, would I delete a comment that calls me a Nazi?  It just makes me look more levelheaded and sane, even if I&#039;m acting like a dick.  Which I don&#039;t think I was, but it&#039;s not even relevant.  Because I&#039;m not the one &lt;i&gt;invoking Godwin&#039;s law&lt;/i&gt;.  Because I&#039;ve both been on the internet &lt;i&gt;and&lt;/i&gt; thinking critically for more than 5 seconds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin's_law" rel="nofollow">OMG IT&#8217;S GODWIN&#8217;S LAW!!!</a></p>
<p>Who would have thunk?  </p>
<p>Could someone please explain to me how looking at this comment: <i>I do by the way accept that we live in a rape apologist culture now that I’ve seen and as soon as you accept that I’m not part of it I’m off to different forums to spread the word and help our cause</i> and inferring that Hugh wants my approval is somehow flattering myself?  I thought that it was <i>reading</i>.</p>
<p>Seriously, dude, you&#8217;re fucked in the head.  If you keep commenting, yes, I will ban you, because there&#8217;s a difference between argument and vomiting all over someone&#8217;s blog.  But you&#8217;re clearly an idiot and an insincere one at that.  You just went from &#8220;oh, but I&#8217;m just trying to learn, I&#8217;m such a Nice Guy(tm)&#8221; to head spinning around in circles in 60 seconds flat.  It&#8217;s impressive, but nothing to be proud of.</p>
<p>Why on earth, by the way, would I delete a comment that calls me a Nazi?  It just makes me look more levelheaded and sane, even if I&#8217;m acting like a dick.  Which I don&#8217;t think I was, but it&#8217;s not even relevant.  Because I&#8217;m not the one <i>invoking Godwin&#8217;s law</i>.  Because I&#8217;ve both been on the internet <i>and</i> thinking critically for more than 5 seconds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://thecurvature.com/2007/10/09/rape-article-offensive-off/#comment-2047</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 22:16:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecurvature.com/2007/10/09/rape-article-offensive-off/#comment-2047</guid>
		<description>Here are some statistics from Australia:

Over half of the women surveyed (57%) had experienced at least one incident of physical or sexual violence over their lifetime.

More than a third of women (34%) had experienced this violence from a former or current partner, although violence from a former partner was more common, and more likely to result in women being injured and feeling that their lives were in danger.

12% of women reported experiencing sexual violence by an intimate partner (current or former) over their lifetimes, including instances of attempted (3%) and completed (6%) forced intercourse (i.e. rape).

Here&#039;s my source (notice the .gov.au domain, indicating it&#039;s a webpage maintained by the Australian Government):
http://www.aifs.gov.au/acssa/statistics.html#internatsurvey</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here are some statistics from Australia:</p>
<p>Over half of the women surveyed (57%) had experienced at least one incident of physical or sexual violence over their lifetime.</p>
<p>More than a third of women (34%) had experienced this violence from a former or current partner, although violence from a former partner was more common, and more likely to result in women being injured and feeling that their lives were in danger.</p>
<p>12% of women reported experiencing sexual violence by an intimate partner (current or former) over their lifetimes, including instances of attempted (3%) and completed (6%) forced intercourse (i.e. rape).</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s my source (notice the .gov.au domain, indicating it&#8217;s a webpage maintained by the Australian Government):<br />
<a href="http://www.aifs.gov.au/acssa/statistics.html#internatsurvey" rel="nofollow">http://www.aifs.gov.au/acssa/statistics.html#internatsurvey</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
