<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It all comes back to controlling women&#8217;s bodies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thecurvature.com/2007/10/14/it-all-comes-back-to-controlling-womens-bodies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thecurvature.com/2007/10/14/it-all-comes-back-to-controlling-womens-bodies/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 04:51:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Elaine Vigneault</title>
		<link>http://thecurvature.com/2007/10/14/it-all-comes-back-to-controlling-womens-bodies/#comment-1718</link>
		<dc:creator>Elaine Vigneault</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 14:27:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecurvature.com/2007/10/14/it-all-comes-back-to-controlling-womens-bodies/#comment-1718</guid>
		<description>Sadly, this news story is not a new phenomenon. In fact, lots of teens who get abortions are pressured by their parents.

I am pro-choice because I believe women ought to have personal autonomy over their bodies. 

But lots of people are pro-choice for selfish reasons. Many parents are pro-choice because they want their daughters to have more options in life than an early pregnancy will allow. 

Many men are pro-choice because they want a back-door safe-guard against accidental pregnancy. Many would rather coerce a woman not to use a condom and to get an abortion than promote women&#039;s freedom and independence.

This is one reason I think calling it a &quot;choice&quot; is ineffective. Those of us working on the side of women&#039;s rights ought to make an effort to call abortion a reproductive right, not a choice, because that&#039;s what it is, a basic human right not to be enslaved.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sadly, this news story is not a new phenomenon. In fact, lots of teens who get abortions are pressured by their parents.</p>
<p>I am pro-choice because I believe women ought to have personal autonomy over their bodies. </p>
<p>But lots of people are pro-choice for selfish reasons. Many parents are pro-choice because they want their daughters to have more options in life than an early pregnancy will allow. </p>
<p>Many men are pro-choice because they want a back-door safe-guard against accidental pregnancy. Many would rather coerce a woman not to use a condom and to get an abortion than promote women&#8217;s freedom and independence.</p>
<p>This is one reason I think calling it a &#8220;choice&#8221; is ineffective. Those of us working on the side of women&#8217;s rights ought to make an effort to call abortion a reproductive right, not a choice, because that&#8217;s what it is, a basic human right not to be enslaved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://thecurvature.com/2007/10/14/it-all-comes-back-to-controlling-womens-bodies/#comment-1692</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 14:58:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecurvature.com/2007/10/14/it-all-comes-back-to-controlling-womens-bodies/#comment-1692</guid>
		<description>You go.  You are absolutely right.  Unfortunately, I don&#039;t share Mary Tracy&#039;s sense that this will work against the antis.  Wish it would, though. Seems clear enough to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You go.  You are absolutely right.  Unfortunately, I don&#8217;t share Mary Tracy&#8217;s sense that this will work against the antis.  Wish it would, though. Seems clear enough to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary Tracy9</title>
		<link>http://thecurvature.com/2007/10/14/it-all-comes-back-to-controlling-womens-bodies/#comment-1690</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary Tracy9</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 00:02:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecurvature.com/2007/10/14/it-all-comes-back-to-controlling-womens-bodies/#comment-1690</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m naive enough to actually think that this works AGAINST anti-choicers. Because it makes it crystal clear that what people are after is CONTRO over the woman&#039;s body, not, as they maintain, after eliminating the &quot;bad option&quot;. If a woman has an abortion, people get mad at her. If she doesn&#039;t, people get mad at her.

I am sure the godbags would be more than happy to support abortion if THEY were the ones deciding over who has it and who doesn&#039;t, instead of the woman.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m naive enough to actually think that this works AGAINST anti-choicers. Because it makes it crystal clear that what people are after is CONTRO over the woman&#8217;s body, not, as they maintain, after eliminating the &#8220;bad option&#8221;. If a woman has an abortion, people get mad at her. If she doesn&#8217;t, people get mad at her.</p>
<p>I am sure the godbags would be more than happy to support abortion if THEY were the ones deciding over who has it and who doesn&#8217;t, instead of the woman.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
