Comments on: Sex . . . normal?

By: Lemur

Lemur — Mon, 21 Jul 2008 06:30:13 +0000

Ah, but Dewey, you forget the Magical Ring combined with the Words of Jesus Power! THAT makes sex okay (but you still can’t like it)! Then the heroin becomes legal! But not before! Before that it’s like molten lava! No sexin’ for you unmarried folk, and you hi-mo-seckshalz don’t exist cause they’re goin to Hay-ell no matter what.
*sigh* See, they don’t even have to say it anymore, we already know what’s coming. It’s just not a full day until you hear wackaloons go wackadoodle.
…Sorry, it’s late and I’m high on violet hairdye. I may be abusing sarcasm, I can’t tell.

By: dewey

dewey — Sat, 19 Jul 2008 13:50:48 +0000

Isn’t cognitive dissonance fun? How do these people reconcile their own evidence, aka children they’re trying to raise to be as twisted as they are, with their sex is like heroin, sex is wrong stance?

By: Jenna

Jenna — Wed, 16 Jul 2008 22:31:44 +0000

“What is this world coming to when we can’t depend on Texas newspapes to consistently spew anti-sex wackaloonery?”

Heh, you’re lucky it was published at all. UT is in Austin, the one blue oasis in a vast ignorant sea of Red. If the same article was submitted to The Houstonian (my alma mater’s paper – Sam Houston State University) or the papers for A&M, U of H, or Stephen F. Austin, it probably would not have been published.

During my time at SHSU, I submitted multiple op/ed pieces, especially whenever some anti-choice/anti-sex/anti-contraception idiot had been given space to spew utter bullshit and the vast majority of them weren’t printed. AND, a few that were printed were selectively edited by the then editor of the opinion page to say something completely different than what I had intended.

In fact, it became so bad with the editor selectively editing pieces to reflect her beliefs that she was eventually removed when enough people complained about the obvious bias not to mention the time she “edited” a piece written by a professor who then took the matter to the deans and the President of the University.

Rejoice it came out at all because as the comments for it suggest, it is definitely not the prevailing opinion in the state.

By: Lemur

Lemur — Wed, 16 Jul 2008 19:24:27 +0000

I’m shocked! Shocked I tell you! What is this world coming to when we can’t depend on Texas newspapers to consistently spew anti-sex wackaloonery?

By: brenna

brenna — Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:17:09 +0000

I thought you might like to see this.

http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/blog/2008/07/15/hhs-moves-define-contraception-abortion