Comments on: Woman Who “Did Not Want to Have Sex” Arrested for Biting Penis

By: Hal

Hal — Fri, 06 Nov 2009 16:20:58 +0000

If he put it in her mouth when against her wishes than she has the right to bite it off. She said no..

By: Greek Woman Allegedly Set Attacker’s Genitals on Fire : The Curvature

Greek Woman Allegedly Set Attacker’s Genitals on Fire : The Curvature — Sat, 08 Aug 2009 16:04:49 +0000

[...] And the woman who defended herself is scolded and dismissed as overreacting, going to far, and being a crazy, vengeful bitch. The man, oh, he was wrong of course. But the woman — why the woman, she should have [...]

By: Cindy

Cindy — Thu, 08 Jan 2009 03:55:36 +0000

So sad *shakes head*

And they say feminism is outdated these days…

By: Cara

Cara — Thu, 08 Jan 2009 03:49:20 +0000

And goodbye, Ikera. Last comment deleted, better luck not getting banned next time.

By: SunlessNick

SunlessNick — Wed, 07 Jan 2009 17:28:48 +0000

I think he’s lying. Aside from the obvious rape implications here – it says he hit in the head. She’s biting his penis and he hits her head? Doesn’t add up.

Hm, in cases of vandalism you certainly wouldn’t expect to see someone respond to a party’s attempt to destroy their heirloom by throwing that heirloom at them.

(In a world where rape is routinely compared to theft, it must be just as legitimate to compare biting a penis to vandalism).

was saying that in a crime of sexual nature the chances of the man getting wrongly accused are higher them woman’s.

Every woman who makes an accusation of rape is called a liar – and even the most extreme MRA stats allege that less than half of rape accusations are false – therefore, more than half of the women are wrongly accused, while less than half of the men are. Sorry.

By: Anna

Anna — Wed, 07 Jan 2009 00:06:04 +0000

not enough information? how much do you fucking want? he was raping her orally and she bit, which is a perfectly valid form of self defense and, practically, the only way I can think of to defend yourself against such an assault.

yes, women lie about rape. a tiny minority. what is it, estimated to be 2%? and on top of this rape crisis estimates 3/4 of rapes aren’t reported. and then there’s rapes that ‘aren’t really rape’ when the woman has (shock horror) willingly imbibed alcohol of her own accord, which obviously means if she passes out drunk any passing male can use her as some sort of receptacle (because, you know. she GOT DRUNK. the tart.)

I don’t find it odd he didn’t get charged. any woman who has been on the receiving end of the justice system as a sexual violence victim wouldn’t.

By: Tdoll

Tdoll — Tue, 06 Jan 2009 23:38:21 +0000

who was the one to call the police, the wife or the husband?

By: Meredith

Meredith — Tue, 06 Jan 2009 16:34:29 +0000

As a resident of the county in question, I am totally not surprised. Good grief.

By: Ikera

Ikera — Tue, 06 Jan 2009 07:41:22 +0000

so I see why it has been deleted
ok I’ll try again
I was saying that in a crime of sexual nature the chances of the man getting wrongly accused are higher them woman’s. And there are women in this world who do take advantage of this. If it sounds misogynistic, I am sorry. But it does happen where woman would lie about rape or would use sex to get what she wants. So I find it really odd that in this case the man didn’t get charged with rape. But just like in the comment above from karak, there is just not enough information to say what should have happened.
P.S. Cara if you decide to delete this at least leave a reply

By: Cara

Cara — Tue, 06 Jan 2009 04:13:47 +0000

I’m not recognizing your name off the top of my head, so I don’t know. It depends on what your comment said. If it said something about how women lie about rape all the time or some such other bullshit, yes, it was deleted. If it wasn’t in any way stupid, obnoxious or misogynistic, I’m sorry; I didn’t get it, and please try again. (Of course, if it did happen to be stupid, obnoxious or misogynistic, then please don’t.)