Comments on: Because the “Not in My Shower” Campaign Worked So Well http://thecurvature.com/2009/01/13/because-the-not-in-my-shower-campaign-worked-so-well/ Sun, 05 Feb 2012 14:47:57 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Wretched and Beautiful : links for 2009-01-27 http://thecurvature.com/2009/01/13/because-the-not-in-my-shower-campaign-worked-so-well/#comment-9915 Wretched and Beautiful : links for 2009-01-27 Tue, 27 Jan 2009 23:03:13 +0000 http://thecurvature.com/?p=3091#comment-9915 [...] Because the “Not in My Shower” Campaign Worked So Well : The Curvature According to some in Gainesville, FL letting transfolk take a leak without getting beaten means that your little blonde children will be raped. (tags: politics queer policestate wtf trans omgthechildren!!!) [...] [...] Because the “Not in My Shower” Campaign Worked So Well : The Curvature According to some in Gainesville, FL letting transfolk take a leak without getting beaten means that your little blonde children will be raped. (tags: politics queer policestate wtf trans omgthechildren!!!) [...]

]]> By: The Bilerico Project http://thecurvature.com/2009/01/13/because-the-not-in-my-shower-campaign-worked-so-well/#comment-9637 The Bilerico Project Wed, 14 Jan 2009 20:00:41 +0000 http://thecurvature.com/?p=3091#comment-9637 <strong>Oops. We were just kidding....</strong> The Kalamazoo City Council knuckles under. When Kalamazoo, Michigan had passed an ordinance that prohibits discrimination in employment, housing or access to public resources on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity, the American Family A... Oops. We were just kidding….

The Kalamazoo City Council knuckles under. When Kalamazoo, Michigan had passed an ordinance that prohibits discrimination in employment, housing or access to public resources on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity, the American Family A…

]]> By: Cara http://thecurvature.com/2009/01/13/because-the-not-in-my-shower-campaign-worked-so-well/#comment-9634 Cara Wed, 14 Jan 2009 14:17:06 +0000 http://thecurvature.com/?p=3091#comment-9634 <blockquote>Hmmm… I thought the point was the a transman (looking like the one in the ad campaign, more likely than a transwoman would) was now allowed *not* to use the same bathroom as the little girl if he chose? Or am I missing something here…?</blockquote> Yes, you're missing that the people who made this ad are trying to repeal that law. And that the ad says that the man going into the women's bathroom is <i>now legal</i> in big scary letters, not that it has created some sort of remedy to the situation.

Hmmm… I thought the point was the a transman (looking like the one in the ad campaign, more likely than a transwoman would) was now allowed *not* to use the same bathroom as the little girl if he chose?

Or am I missing something here…?

Yes, you’re missing that the people who made this ad are trying to repeal that law. And that the ad says that the man going into the women’s bathroom is now legal in big scary letters, not that it has created some sort of remedy to the situation.

]]> By: Renee http://thecurvature.com/2009/01/13/because-the-not-in-my-shower-campaign-worked-so-well/#comment-9631 Renee Wed, 14 Jan 2009 04:36:33 +0000 http://thecurvature.com/?p=3091#comment-9631 Thanks for the linky love and bringing attention to this. I found this campaign to be so incredibly hateful and dishonest I could barely blog my outrage. Thanks for the linky love and bringing attention to this. I found this campaign to be so incredibly hateful and dishonest I could barely blog my outrage.

]]> By: Anon Ymous http://thecurvature.com/2009/01/13/because-the-not-in-my-shower-campaign-worked-so-well/#comment-9630 Anon Ymous Wed, 14 Jan 2009 04:06:14 +0000 http://thecurvature.com/?p=3091#comment-9630 Hmmm... I thought the point was the a transman (looking like the one in the ad campaign, more likely than a transwoman would) was now allowed *not* to use the same bathroom as the little girl if he chose? Or am I missing something here...? (Oh, and speaking from a completely different perspective... since *when* has it been illegal to use the "wrong" gendered toilet? I can't count the number of times the womens toilets have been locked, being cleaned, or just plain busy with a line out the door and I've nipped into the blokes toilet next door... Always with a knock to make sure no one's using the urinals, and never with any of the blokes giving me any trouble over it at all...) Hmmm… I thought the point was the a transman (looking like the one in the ad campaign, more likely than a transwoman would) was now allowed *not* to use the same bathroom as the little girl if he chose?

Or am I missing something here…?

(Oh, and speaking from a completely different perspective… since *when* has it been illegal to use the “wrong” gendered toilet? I can’t count the number of times the womens toilets have been locked, being cleaned, or just plain busy with a line out the door and I’ve nipped into the blokes toilet next door… Always with a knock to make sure no one’s using the urinals, and never with any of the blokes giving me any trouble over it at all…)

]]>