<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What is the Future of Abstinence-Only Sex Education?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thecurvature.com/2009/01/19/what-is-the-future-of-abstinence-only-sex-education/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thecurvature.com/2009/01/19/what-is-the-future-of-abstinence-only-sex-education/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2012 20:40:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neon</title>
		<link>http://thecurvature.com/2009/01/19/what-is-the-future-of-abstinence-only-sex-education/#comment-9781</link>
		<dc:creator>Neon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 04:44:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecurvature.com/?p=3189#comment-9781</guid>
		<description>AOE is a joke. &quot;Wait Training&quot; was one of Bush&#039;s approved programs and the facts within actually contradicted figures put out by the CDC. It&#039;s one thing to push a backwards ideology into schools but to ignore hard facts in regards to safer sex is just inexcusable. 

Few people realize that in the late seventies/early eighties condom use was encouraged in schools and even abortion was labeled a necessary evil. If Reagen hadn&#039;t charged in on his moral high horse this wouldn&#039;t even be an issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AOE is a joke. &#8220;Wait Training&#8221; was one of Bush&#8217;s approved programs and the facts within actually contradicted figures put out by the CDC. It&#8217;s one thing to push a backwards ideology into schools but to ignore hard facts in regards to safer sex is just inexcusable. </p>
<p>Few people realize that in the late seventies/early eighties condom use was encouraged in schools and even abortion was labeled a necessary evil. If Reagen hadn&#8217;t charged in on his moral high horse this wouldn&#8217;t even be an issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nina</title>
		<link>http://thecurvature.com/2009/01/19/what-is-the-future-of-abstinence-only-sex-education/#comment-9723</link>
		<dc:creator>Nina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 17:32:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecurvature.com/?p=3189#comment-9723</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re absolutely right. There isn&#039;t going to be an immediate revocation of funding. It&#039;ll probably dwindle away over time, but taking away funding immediately will only fuel the anti-choicers&#039; rhetoric.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re absolutely right. There isn&#8217;t going to be an immediate revocation of funding. It&#8217;ll probably dwindle away over time, but taking away funding immediately will only fuel the anti-choicers&#8217; rhetoric.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

