<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pretending That Individual Choices Will Help Correct Structural Problems</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thecurvature.com/2009/09/11/pretending-that-individual-choices-will-help-correct-structural-problems/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thecurvature.com/2009/09/11/pretending-that-individual-choices-will-help-correct-structural-problems/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2012 20:40:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: smart tips and empowered births &#171; guerrilla mama medicine</title>
		<link>http://thecurvature.com/2009/09/11/pretending-that-individual-choices-will-help-correct-structural-problems/#comment-14918</link>
		<dc:creator>smart tips and empowered births &#171; guerrilla mama medicine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 16:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecurvature.com/?p=6391#comment-14918</guid>
		<description>[...] first one is on these smart tips and the class assumptions by the author of these tips. The press release, though, was actually [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] first one is on these smart tips and the class assumptions by the author of these tips. The press release, though, was actually [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lauredhel</title>
		<link>http://thecurvature.com/2009/09/11/pretending-that-individual-choices-will-help-correct-structural-problems/#comment-14808</link>
		<dc:creator>lauredhel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 10:17:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecurvature.com/?p=6391#comment-14808</guid>
		<description>Plus, ew, I&#039;ve only just scrutinised point one closely. Firstly, there is no screening for &quot;mental retardation&quot; in pregnancy, only for some chromosomal conditions, none of which guarantee any particular level of intellectual disability. Secondly, many women make informed choices not to screen for chromosomal atypicalities or spina bifida while they are pregnant, and this advice seems to completely erase the possibility of that choice, instead assuming that 100% of women think that having a child with a disability would be completely unacceptable to them. (And that all women would _have_ access to abortion.)

The last one is a dud as well - routine screening of low risk women for gestational diabetes and with routine ultrasound has been pretty comprehensively shown to be unassociated with any change in pregnancy outcomes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Plus, ew, I&#8217;ve only just scrutinised point one closely. Firstly, there is no screening for &#8220;mental retardation&#8221; in pregnancy, only for some chromosomal conditions, none of which guarantee any particular level of intellectual disability. Secondly, many women make informed choices not to screen for chromosomal atypicalities or spina bifida while they are pregnant, and this advice seems to completely erase the possibility of that choice, instead assuming that 100% of women think that having a child with a disability would be completely unacceptable to them. (And that all women would _have_ access to abortion.)</p>
<p>The last one is a dud as well &#8211; routine screening of low risk women for gestational diabetes and with routine ultrasound has been pretty comprehensively shown to be unassociated with any change in pregnancy outcomes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lauredhel</title>
		<link>http://thecurvature.com/2009/09/11/pretending-that-individual-choices-will-help-correct-structural-problems/#comment-14807</link>
		<dc:creator>lauredhel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 10:13:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecurvature.com/?p=6391#comment-14807</guid>
		<description>Applause for this post. 

&quot; First, tell the doctor the truth.&quot;

This comment actually comes from a place of privilege, and while it sounds superficially attractive, it is not good advice for all women. If you are, for example, a poor woman of colour, telling your doctor that (for example) you had a drink or a joint or two in pregnancy could put you on the fast track to inappropriate scrutiny and child removal. Talking about a past history of psychiatric illness can do much the same (there has been a particularly terrible history of this in the UK).

Hear hear to Holly on point &quot;R&quot; - making sure you birth with a specialist doctor in a &quot;high level&quot; facility increases your chance of damaging interventions and unnecessary surgical birth dramatically. One-to-one care with a caseload midwife, consulting specialist doctors only where absolutely necessary, is the gold standard of care.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Applause for this post. </p>
<p>&#8221; First, tell the doctor the truth.&#8221;</p>
<p>This comment actually comes from a place of privilege, and while it sounds superficially attractive, it is not good advice for all women. If you are, for example, a poor woman of colour, telling your doctor that (for example) you had a drink or a joint or two in pregnancy could put you on the fast track to inappropriate scrutiny and child removal. Talking about a past history of psychiatric illness can do much the same (there has been a particularly terrible history of this in the UK).</p>
<p>Hear hear to Holly on point &#8220;R&#8221; &#8211; making sure you birth with a specialist doctor in a &#8220;high level&#8221; facility increases your chance of damaging interventions and unnecessary surgical birth dramatically. One-to-one care with a caseload midwife, consulting specialist doctors only where absolutely necessary, is the gold standard of care.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gina</title>
		<link>http://thecurvature.com/2009/09/11/pretending-that-individual-choices-will-help-correct-structural-problems/#comment-14539</link>
		<dc:creator>Gina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 17:39:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecurvature.com/?p=6391#comment-14539</guid>
		<description>Pretending that individual choices will help correct structural problems is a long-standing tradition in American politics.  See the emphasis on things like recycling or going green instead of cracking down on huge industrial polluters or doing anything about our oil consumption on a national level for one example.  Add a dose of blaming women for things outside their control (another long-standing tradition) and you&#039;ve got a classic piece of American wisdom to disseminate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pretending that individual choices will help correct structural problems is a long-standing tradition in American politics.  See the emphasis on things like recycling or going green instead of cracking down on huge industrial polluters or doing anything about our oil consumption on a national level for one example.  Add a dose of blaming women for things outside their control (another long-standing tradition) and you&#8217;ve got a classic piece of American wisdom to disseminate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nyara</title>
		<link>http://thecurvature.com/2009/09/11/pretending-that-individual-choices-will-help-correct-structural-problems/#comment-14537</link>
		<dc:creator>Nyara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 10:46:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecurvature.com/?p=6391#comment-14537</guid>
		<description>Very well said.

You know what&#039;s sad? I saw the first line- &lt;I&gt;The other day, I received a press release titled “It’s Riskier to Have a Baby in the U.S. Than in Cuba or the Czech Republic.”&lt;/I&gt;- and immediately said &quot;Let me guess- They put all of the blame on women?&quot; I hate being right, sometimes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very well said.</p>
<p>You know what&#8217;s sad? I saw the first line- <i>The other day, I received a press release titled “It’s Riskier to Have a Baby in the U.S. Than in Cuba or the Czech Republic.”</i>- and immediately said &#8220;Let me guess- They put all of the blame on women?&#8221; I hate being right, sometimes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sunday News Round-Up, 9/13/09 &#171; Women&#8217;s Health News</title>
		<link>http://thecurvature.com/2009/09/11/pretending-that-individual-choices-will-help-correct-structural-problems/#comment-14528</link>
		<dc:creator>Sunday News Round-Up, 9/13/09 &#171; Women&#8217;s Health News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 17:21:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecurvature.com/?p=6391#comment-14528</guid>
		<description>[...] has a decent rant at The Curvature, Pretending That Individual Choices Will Help Correct Structural Problems. In part: I’m sick of pretending that health problems can be fixed by all of us just being [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] has a decent rant at The Curvature, Pretending That Individual Choices Will Help Correct Structural Problems. In part: I’m sick of pretending that health problems can be fixed by all of us just being [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://thecurvature.com/2009/09/11/pretending-that-individual-choices-will-help-correct-structural-problems/#comment-14526</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 05:24:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecurvature.com/?p=6391#comment-14526</guid>
		<description>From what I could tell, out of that whole list, there are really only two constructive suggestions.  First, tell the doctor the truth.  Second, do some research on your doctor/insurance carrier.  All that other stuff sounds like medical jargon that a good doctor will know and test for without being asked.  Without a doctor, these suggestions couldn&#039;t possibly help a couple.

I wish more people could see health care in these terms.  Having mothers and their children survive childbirth seems like one of the most fundamental concerns society and individuals could possibly have, but I hardly ever hear any mention of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From what I could tell, out of that whole list, there are really only two constructive suggestions.  First, tell the doctor the truth.  Second, do some research on your doctor/insurance carrier.  All that other stuff sounds like medical jargon that a good doctor will know and test for without being asked.  Without a doctor, these suggestions couldn&#8217;t possibly help a couple.</p>
<p>I wish more people could see health care in these terms.  Having mothers and their children survive childbirth seems like one of the most fundamental concerns society and individuals could possibly have, but I hardly ever hear any mention of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: factcheckme</title>
		<link>http://thecurvature.com/2009/09/11/pretending-that-individual-choices-will-help-correct-structural-problems/#comment-14522</link>
		<dc:creator>factcheckme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 17:48:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecurvature.com/?p=6391#comment-14522</guid>
		<description>i had the same reaction to &quot;pregnancy for dummies.&quot;  WTF?  as in, any stupid fucking whore can get pregnant, but only a &quot;smart&quot; one will have a healthy child (and survive its birth, herself).  what does intelligence and indeed &quot;choice&quot; have to do with it, when so many women dont have access to medical care, or even the basics for her own survivial?  good piece, thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i had the same reaction to &#8220;pregnancy for dummies.&#8221;  WTF?  as in, any stupid fucking whore can get pregnant, but only a &#8220;smart&#8221; one will have a healthy child (and survive its birth, herself).  what does intelligence and indeed &#8220;choice&#8221; have to do with it, when so many women dont have access to medical care, or even the basics for her own survivial?  good piece, thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Holly</title>
		<link>http://thecurvature.com/2009/09/11/pretending-that-individual-choices-will-help-correct-structural-problems/#comment-14521</link>
		<dc:creator>Holly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 15:20:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecurvature.com/?p=6391#comment-14521</guid>
		<description>Who wrote those &quot;SMART&quot; recommendations?  Private insurers?  YIKES.

That&#039;s one heck of a lot of medical care for a condition that&#039;s NOT an illness.  The list assumes that &quot;risk&quot; comes from babies who aren&#039;t some standard of &quot;perfect&quot; -- or (as you suggest) mothers who aren&#039;t some standard of &quot;perfect&quot;.  Blegh.

Make childbirth safer and cheaper?  Put all births in the hands of midwives in midwifery/birthing facilities (within or close by to a medical center, great) and let OBs handle only high-risk deliveries.  (If you are not a high-risk case, the chance of you and your baby dying in the hospital is greater than of you and your baby dying at home.)  Sort of a no-brainer, and definitely an issue well covered and brilliantly argued by feminist scholars.  It&#039;s not that women don&#039;t have health care to get coverage... it&#039;s that they are only allowed to get certain coverage to see certain types of providers.  There is no &quot;choice&quot; in reproduction, at any point in the process.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who wrote those &#8220;SMART&#8221; recommendations?  Private insurers?  YIKES.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s one heck of a lot of medical care for a condition that&#8217;s NOT an illness.  The list assumes that &#8220;risk&#8221; comes from babies who aren&#8217;t some standard of &#8220;perfect&#8221; &#8212; or (as you suggest) mothers who aren&#8217;t some standard of &#8220;perfect&#8221;.  Blegh.</p>
<p>Make childbirth safer and cheaper?  Put all births in the hands of midwives in midwifery/birthing facilities (within or close by to a medical center, great) and let OBs handle only high-risk deliveries.  (If you are not a high-risk case, the chance of you and your baby dying in the hospital is greater than of you and your baby dying at home.)  Sort of a no-brainer, and definitely an issue well covered and brilliantly argued by feminist scholars.  It&#8217;s not that women don&#8217;t have health care to get coverage&#8230; it&#8217;s that they are only allowed to get certain coverage to see certain types of providers.  There is no &#8220;choice&#8221; in reproduction, at any point in the process.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GallingGalla</title>
		<link>http://thecurvature.com/2009/09/11/pretending-that-individual-choices-will-help-correct-structural-problems/#comment-14519</link>
		<dc:creator>GallingGalla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 01:40:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecurvature.com/?p=6391#comment-14519</guid>
		<description>Tell it Cara!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tell it Cara!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

